السبت، 27 فبراير 2021

Biden, Putin and the poles conflict


Biden, Putin and the poles conflict

 Reading the international event to discover what is behind the game is not a case of "intellectual luxury" and it is not a topic for entertainment, it is an attempt to create awareness and create knowledge, and from there we go as "Arabs" to know what is going on around us and through that knowledge we have to plan the confrontation and anticipate the event, because we have to be a nation.  And the nation that reads, and the nation the witness, and we as individuals within this nation must know our legitimate responsibilities and our national duties by living the responsibility of leadership according to the ability and positions of power available to each of us.
 So what is happening on the ground in the Arab ocean around us?  what's new?  What is dangerous?
 There is an upcoming change in the American way of dealing with the Russian file, and this is evident with what the Russian researcher Alexander Dugin revealed, "the owner of ties and relations with the Russian Kremlin institution and also with the military establishment there and also he is a strategic researcher and from all this highlights the importance of what he says, especially what  He trusted his book, "The Last War on the World Island, where he mentioned a very important incident that will reveal to us the truth of the current US President Biden's intentions, far from the hidden mask of propaganda and rhetoric made by official Americans propaganda - and it is re-published in the Arab media, intentionally or unintentionally."  Away from the reality of their movement on the ground.
 Dogan says: "During the visit of US Vice President Joe Biden to Moscow in the spring of 2011, he tried to interfere in Russian internal affairs when he demanded that Russian President Putin not run for a second term, warning him of a" color revolution "similar to what happened in the Arab world in 2011.

 This documented old talk is a revealing of what is happening now with the beginning of the current inauguration of Joe Biden as the current president of the United States of America, where there is a movement of arms associated with the CIA, and this employment movement was not activated until after Biden's presidential inauguration, which is an "urgent" "" urgent "" activation.  And "fast" in the first week within the American presidential position, and this is clearly related to what he said in the year 2011, which is a documented, written and published saying in which there is a deep desire to overthrow the Russian political system by the method of soft revolutions that began to be used in Georgia with success and was done  It was thwarted later in the Islamic Republic established on the land of Iran in 2009, and it was also overthrown in the Lebanese Republic 2007, and these are the same mechanisms that went out of control and were struck in other locations in Ukraine and within our Arab surroundings in Egypt, Yemen, Tunisia and Bahrain until they were re-launched in the Syrian Arab Republic  And now these mechanisms are being reactivated against Russia, "the state and the political system," and anyone who wants other documented details can review our book "Behind the Sight" issued in 2017.
 In this atmosphere that is being heated up inside Russia against the state and the political system there, and I do not say "against Putin's person as president," the strategic analyst Iskander Nazarov says in this regard:
 The United States of America is gradually plunging into a devastating crisis for which there is no safe exit. It is clear that the crisis is deteriorating and will end sooner or later with the collapse of the economy and the civil war in the United States of America. Washington has only 5-10 years left, maximum, before China is solved.  "Its place as the largest economy in the world, followed by the collapse of the United States. Under these circumstances, it seems that the ruling deep state of the United States of America decided not to fight on two fronts simultaneously, and to liquidate Russia first before confronting China."
 On the extent to which these coup mechanisms can succeed in the Russian reality, Nazarov adds the following:
 Will the CIA succeed in igniting a color revolution in Russia?
 When talking about the Russian internal situation, most moderate Russian analysts say that Russia is based on a "social contract" between citizens and the political elite that represents the ruling authority, whatever this power and the political forces it belongs to, in exchange for ensuring stability and security for ordinary citizens, and stable growth of the people's well-being.  The Russian Federation, including its poorest class, even if that growth was modest.
 Vladimir Putin has succeeded in this task so far, taking into account the recent Corona pandemic crisis, and the increasing global economic crisis, which led to a drop in the country's GDP by a remarkable percentage, but most Russian citizens see with their own eyes how Russia has managed to overcome this  The crisis is more successful than the USA and Western Europe.

 “The West, apparently on its way to collapse, desires to destroy Russia. But Putin is a seasoned politician, and I hope the authority will have the wisdom to find a balance between restraint and reasonable toughness. I think that attempts to destabilize Russia will not be successful.”

 Note that President Putin seems to be working on a project to restore Russia as a superpower and change the world from a unipolar policy led by the United States of America to a multi-polar world that places Russia and China as poles competing with America. All of Putin's "defensive" moves on the Russian interest from the second war in Chechnya in 1999 to annexation  Crimea 2014 indicates that Russia will not stand and watch any threat to its regional environment and NATO.
 Where are we as "Arabs" from such developments?  And work?  How do we act?  What are our interests?  What do we want?  What is the impact on us?
 In our Arab reality, which lacks a plan to deal with the imperial conflicts around us, what do we have to deal with the others around us?  The answer is nothing but waiting for the results of the struggles of others, who all view us from the periphery to the Gulf as "Arabs" and as "one nation", but we Arabs look at ourselves according to the divisions of the old British-French-Russian-Bolshevik agreement known as Says-Picot !?  And we expect from the Turkish Turanians with an Islamic slogan the solution or waiting for the benefit of Iranian nationalism with an Islamic slogan deviated from the line of Imam Khomeini and his ideas ?!  The worst of all this and that is the Arabs who laid their eggs with our Zionist enemies expecting from them victory, and they are the ones who want to destroy and humiliate all Arab reality and are not a site of victory, security, safety, or trust. These Zionists are our enemies and our struggle with them is my existence. We are as "Arabs" or they "as  "Zionists" and there is no third way. As for the Americans and the group of NATO countries that fall under the influence of the Zionist lobby, these have proven history and the present, and as the future will prove that they are reformers that only benefit them, not charities that offer us security and real development.

 As "Arabs", we must first admit that we are "Arabs !?"  And that we have unity, coordination, cooperation, solidarity and exit from the plans of others to present our plans and projects that serve us as "Arabs" just as all regional and continental imperial projects serve their nationalities, and this is the reality of the international and the nature of conflicts in it and other than this talk is a departure from reality to the world of dreams where illusion, mirage and loss  In the wandering desert.
 We have to know that sitting at the same table with NATO members, with the Zionists, with the Turkish Turans, or with Iranian nationalists will not make us superpowers or influential people, but we will be sitting at a table !?  While others .... all others have decision, control, and positions of power.
 Arab reconciliation is a "demand" and Arab unity is an inevitable "destiny", because those around us regionally are "nationalists" in their movement and reformists in their goals, and they only care about our official and popular Arab reality with what benefits their other nationalities that contradict our Arab nationalism and our reality.
 And between the demand for reconciliation and the destiny of unity, the initial coordination remains the weakest of faith, if you will, and everything that is a movement on the ground started from an idea and around it, convictions gather, and then the idea heads to the line of implementation.
 In the recent Gulf reconciliation, we have the example and the practical reality that we all lived, and we also had the inauguration of the embassies of the Sultanate of Oman and the United Arab Emirates inside the Syrian Arab Republic, another close present that we lived through.
 Strangers will not care about us as "Arabs" except in the amount of their interests and in the manner of their countries 'projects, and we will be a victim of others' projects if side Arab conflicts continue, which will not benefit anyone except in the continuing fall of our entire reality in the bosom of the projects of strangers around us.
 The challenges surrounding the Arab reality are great as well as dangerous amid conflicts of regional powers that want to dominate and powers greater than them that want to impose their projects and there are those who want to continue their successes in penetrating the Arab reality that it brought about from here and there.
 What do we have as Arabs, except unity and coordination between us on the official side, we talk, as well as strengthening popular work linked to opening the cultural, economic and transportation fields, which are participations that benefit everyone and benefit all Arabs, and the Arab official system can start from them as popular and interest participants that are like someone who breaks the deadlock of relations and the partisans of previous conflicts or dissonance  From the official handling of a situation that occurred from here, or a political decision from there, or anger at a certain behavior from there.

 Dr. Adel Reda
 Endocrinologist and diabetic doctor
 Kuwaiti writer on Arab and Islamic affairs

ليست هناك تعليقات:

إرسال تعليق